Overland Park Officials Evaluate Subsidy for Black & Veatch Development

News Summary

Overland Park city officials are evaluating a proposed $230 million public subsidy for Black & Veatch’s Overland Park Plaza II project. This plan aims to transform a 78-acre campus into a $1.12 billion mixed-use development, which includes housing, retail, and other amenities. Despite the potential benefits, the subsidy has sparked criticism regarding its impact on local competition and the fairness of using taxpayer funds for a private firm. A public hearing will provide residents with the opportunity to share their views on the proposal.

Overland Park Considers $230 Million Subsidy for Black & Veatch’s Mixed-Use Project

Officials in Overland Park are weighing a substantial proposal that could involve nearly $230 million in public subsidies aimed at supporting a major real estate development spearheaded by Black & Veatch, a prominent engineering firm. The initiative, named Overland Park Plaza II, aims to transform the 78-acre campus of Black & Veatch into a $1.12 billion mixed-use development.

The ambitious project plans to feature a new headquarters, approximately 1,900 residential units, a hotel, retail space, a public park, and around 6,000 parking spots. To help finance these developments, Black & Veatch is seeking $227.7 million in tax increment financing (TIF), along with nearly $19.9 million from a special sales tax district and exemptions from construction-related sales taxes.

Collectively, these incentives would cover about 22% of the total project cost. Under Kansas law, properties designated as “conservation areas,” which typically indicate deteriorating conditions, can qualify for TIF funding. However, the campus is not in disrepair; rather, it is undergoing a transformation, a strategy often employed in the private sector that typically does not rely on public financing.

This situation reflects similar occurrences in the area where private entities have sought taxpayer-funded support to refurbish or repurpose existing assets. Generally, public subsidies aimed at private developments face criticism for failing to produce genuine economic benefits, and instead may lead to job relocations without actual growth in employment or investment.

Although city officials have acknowledged that Black & Veatch has no current plans to shift jobs from the city, the company appears to be capitalizing on this opportunity to request financial backing. The proposed amount is significantly greater than previous financial assistance received by the company, which included industrial revenue bonds and tax abatements granted in 2009 and 2012.

As Black & Veatch ventures into the realms of residential, hospitality, and commercial real estate, concerns linger about the necessity of public assistance in these sectors that are already being serviced by private developers. Critics argue that offering taxpayer support solely to a single entity could skew the local real estate market and hinder competition.

As competing developers face the burden of shouldering all project costs, the financial advantages conferred to Black & Veatch through these subsidies raise questions regarding fairness and market dynamics. Moreover, the lack of transparency in these dealings prompts a reevaluation of whether public funds should be utilized for what are fundamentally private investments.

City officials are urged to critically examine whether their approach serves the principles of equitable governance or merely facilitates the expansion of a singular business entity using taxpayer resources. The first public hearing regarding the project is set to take place on July 7 at Overland Park City Hall, offering residents the opportunity to participate in person or view the proceedings online.

Past audits conducted by the Kansas Legislature have raised concerns about the reality that economic development subsidies often fall short of anticipated results. Additionally, such costs can detrimentally affect essential public services, including schools and infrastructure. As the city deliberates this substantial subsidy proposal, the community seeks to understand its potential implications on local economics and governance.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

Additional Resources

• Kansas City Opinion
• Wikipedia: Economic Development
• MSN News
• Google Search: Overland Park subsidy debates
• Johnson County Post
• Google Scholar: Tax Increment Financing
• KSHB News
• Encyclopedia Britannica: Subsidy
• National Review